HUTSCHENREUTHER PORCELAIN OP ART FLOOR VASE Nr. 02323/33
SKU: 98497293273

HUTSCHENREUTHER PORCELAIN OP ART FLOOR VASE Nr. 02323/33

Sale price$141.75 Regular price$157.50
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 7 - Jul 12

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

HUTSCHENREUTHER PORCELAIN OP ART FLOOR VASE Nr. 02323/33A very large, flared '70s Op Art floor vase with a basket weave relief pattern from PORZELLANFABRIKEN LORENZ HUTSCHENREUTHER AG SELB, Germany. Hutschenreuther is the family name of a German father and son who established competing porcelain manufactories in north east Bavaria in the 19th century. C. M. HUTSCHENREUTHER AG was first organized as a porcelain decorating factory in the Bavarian town of Hohenberg an der Eger by its eponymous founder, Carl

A very large, flared '70s Op-Art floor vase with a basket weave relief pattern from PORZELLANFABRIKEN LORENZ HUTSCHENREUTHER AG SELB, Germany.


Hutschenreuther is the family name of a German father and son who established competing porcelain manufactories in north-east Bavaria in the 19th century.

C.M. HUTSCHENREUTHER AG was first organized as a porcelain decorating factory in the Bavarian town of Hohenberg an der Eger by its eponymous founder, Carl Magnus Hutschenreuther (1794–1845) in 1814. He decided to try his hand at making porcelain for himself when deposits of kaolin, the soft white clay essential in its production, were discovered locally near the River Eger. The district forester, a relative, Ernst Ludwig Reuß set aside space in Hohenberg Castle for Hutschenreuther to paint porcelain and study its manufacture. In 1816 Hutschenreuther married Reuß' daughter, Johanna Maria Barbara.

After many years of petitioning the Bavarian authorities, a concession was finally granted to C.M. HUTSCHENREUTHER in 1822 to set up a kiln. By that time, a disused alum works on the site of the present-day factory had been acquired. At first, it seems that Hutschenreuther mixed the raw materials himself and similarly oversaw all of the firings so as to keep his processes secret. Only after a second kiln was constructed and additional decorators hired, did the company become successful—supplemented by the sale of white wares to free-lance painters.

To enhance product quality, C.M. HUTSCHENREUTHER recruited artists, craftsmen, and sculptors from all over continental Europe. Primarily focusing on quality and design, the company grew into a competitive firm that produced dinnerware services that were ideal for fine dining. After his death in 1845, Hutschenreuther's widow, along with sons Lorenz and Christian, ran the business. A large part of the factory suffered a devastating fire in 1848 but was quickly rebuilt.

PORZELLANFABRIKEN LORENZ HUTSCHENREUTHER AG SELB (aka LHS) had its origins in 1857 when Lorenz Hutschenreuther (1817–1886) struck out on his own and established a competing factory in the Bavarian town of Selb. The business grew throughout the early 20th century—in large measure by buying up the assets of neighboring firms, including those of Paul Müller, Selb. It was after the acquisition of Müller's art division in 1917 that LHS began producing figurines. By 1926 its art production had won wide acclaim, and the figurines in particular were highly sought after. LHS created many of its most famous dinnerware patterns during the first half of the last century, including Racine (1900), Richelieu (1929), Blue Onion (1930), and Maple Leaf (1940).

LHS marketed aggressively and ultimately became the more notable of the two Hutschenreuther concerns. Indeed, it was the first German firm to seriously rival the famous British porcelain brands. At no point was any partnership established between LHS and C.M. HUTSCHENREUTHER; the two companies would remain fully independent and in open competition for over a century.

By the end of WWII, both businesses had suffered losses, particularly C.M. HUTSCHENREUTHER. Many of its plants had been situated in territory that came under the control of Soviet satellites, and they were duly expropriated, as were a few mines belonging to LHS. Both companies were also faced with severe war-related restrictions. However, by the early 1950s recovery was well underway. The art pottery department at LHS played a significant role during the decade. Shape and décor designers of the time produced many of the company's most notable creations. The artists Hans Achtziger, Hildegard Gruinseiser, Christian Modrack, and Rudolf Lunghard deserve special mention. Much of the work was free-form.

In 1969, the assets of C.M. HUTSCHENREUHTER were purchased by LHS and the two companies at last became one. The newly united company continued to produce fine bone china and porcelain figurines. In 1972 the company merged with Kahla AG, and in 2000 it became part of the Rosenthal division of the Waterford Wedgwood Group. Rosenthal continues to use the Hutschenreuther’s trademark "lion insignia." (As of 2009, Rosenthal is an independent division of the Italian firm Sambonet Paderno.)


DETAILS

Maker – HUTSCHENREUTHER

Production Period/Year – 1970s

Designer – DESIGNER

Design Period/Year – PERIOD/YEAR

Origin – GERMANY

Styles/Movements – MID-CENTURY MODERN; MINIMALIST; OP ART

Materials – PORCELAIN

Colors – WHITE

Condition – Excellent vintage condition.

Dimensions – 8" DIAM. × 13 ¼" H

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 98497293273

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 1973 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
D
Verified Purchase
Diana D
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Very well written and easy to read.
Format: Paperback
Few people are as qualified as Philip Meyer to write a book on storytelling for lawyers. With a background as a trial lawyer, he has plenty of practical, real-life experience in the courtroom. His approach is not that of an academic giving purely theoretical advice, but that of a seasoned lawyer who knows the ins and outs of the legal profession. His experience as a professor (of both law and writing) has honed his ability to effectively communicate his ideas to a broad audience. Not only is this book helpful for the practicing lawyer, it is also useful and not too complex for the legal neophyte or casual reader. This book breaks storytelling (narrative) down to its core components and analyzes them one by one. In the process of analyzing each part of a story, Philip Meyer skillfully explores each component with a non-legal example (e.g. movies, books, etc.) before applying it to a legal example (e.g. courtroom proceedings, appellate briefs, closing arguments, etc.) By first analyzing each part of a story (i.e. plot, setting, etc.) from a well-known story that resonates with the reader, he sets a strong foundation before transitioning to a legal story, thus making it easy for the reader to identify and better understand each part of the legal story. I highly recommend this book to anyone remotely interested in storytelling and persuasion as they relate to the legal profession.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 22, 2016
J
Verified Purchase
JR
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 4
Must Read for Novice Litigators
Format: Paperback
This book is a great starting point for developing the skill of storytelling for lawyers as was intended by the author. The author gives you the basics for developing the plot, characters, style, setting, and narrative for your trial with excellent examples. The author is a law professor and the book seems geared for the law student or novice lawyers getting into litigation. I only gave the book 4 out of 5 stars because of a couple of minor problems. However, the chapter on narrative needs further exposition and appears to be written in rushed manner. In addition, the physical binding of the book is of poor quality requiring me to glue the cover back on. Finally, the author missed the point that the lawyer's job is to look at his case as a giant puzzle to be solved and then explained as a story.It is not enough to understand your case but equally imperative that you communicate your case which is best done through the storytelling technique. This is a must read for lawyers getting up to speed on litigation. For further exposition on legal storytelling for lawyers after reading Meyer's book on Storytelling for Lawyers, I recommend the following: ABA webinar available with an internet search for "Storytelling for Lawyers"
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 25, 2018
T
Verified Purchase
Tahoeman
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Much needed guide to narration in law practice
Format: Paperback
Meyer’s “Storytelling for Lawyers” is an important contribution to the literature on narration in law practice. We know that successful courtroom rhetoric can best be viewed through the prism of storytelling. But the literature does not contain a practical and detailed analysis of the elements of narration as used in law practice—that is, plotting, characterization, point of view, style, and settings in place and time. Meyer’s book fills this gap. It is blessedly free of jargon and full of practical examples of good legal storytelling. But the importance of this book goes well beyond providing practical assistance to litigators. It serves as a much-needed introduction to the principles of narration for teachers and students of literature, creative writing, and popular culture, who have lacked a readable introductory guide to the elements of successful storytelling.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 10, 2014
D
Verified Purchase
David R. Papke
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
Recommended for All Lawyers
Format: Paperback
Meyer proves his initial point that much of what lawyers do is storytelling, and he achieves his goal of providing a primer on narrative theory for lawyer-storytellers. The book is sophisticated but written in an engaging way using non-technical language. Examples from legal and literary works abound, and they range from courtroom arguments and appellate briefs on the one hand to an essay by Joan Didion and Vonnegut's "Slaughterhouse Five" on the other. Meyer's favorite stories are found in Hollywood movies, and although he seems unaware of the accomplishment,Meyer provides fresh interpretations of such movies as "HIgh Noon" and"Jaws." I strongly recommend "Storytelling for Lawyers" for all law students, lawyers, and judges.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2014
D
Verified Purchase
DoubtfulReader
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 3
Notes on Legal Style by a Law Professor and Experienced Lawyer.
Format: Kindle
BOOK REVIEW: MEYER, Philip N., Storytelling for Lawyers ISBN: 978-0-19-5396638 Read June, 13th-27th, 2017. This book discusses storytelling tools by presenting a series of examples of good storytelling, both in legal settings and in literary works and movies. If theoretical explanations are sometimes a bit dry, the frequent quoting of practical examples conveys fluidity and speed to the book. After an introduction presenting lawyers as storytellers, it deals with the roles played in storytelling by Plots (chapters 2 and 3); Character (4 and 5); Voice, Perspective, Details and Images, and Rhytm and Speed (which relate to Scene and Summary) (chapter 6); Place or Story Environment (chapter 7) and Narrative Time. Focusing maybe too narrowly on legal storytelling before American juries, plot is almost equated with melodrama. Films like Jaws and High Noon are extensively discussed, as Gerry Spence’s Closing Argument on Behalf of Karen Silkwood. The chapters on character offer interesting insights on character classification (“round” characters, with psychological depth, prone to suffer transformation as the story evolves, vs. “flat” ones), while discussing the tools for telling how a character is, as opposed to simply showing the psychological nature of each character’s character through dialogue or the actions the character performs. Examples include Tobias Wolff’s This Boy’s Life and Jeremiah Donovan’s Closing Arguments on Behalf of Louis Failla, in a 13-week trial the Author could scrupulously attend in person. Discussions on Voice, Perspective, Details and Images, Scene and Summary, criticize the basic assumptions of the neutrality of lawyers’ voices, exemplifies how to manage details to suggest ideas and emotions, draw on the distinction between showing and telling, and offers interesting insights into the narrative theory’s concept of stretch (the slowing of the narrative rhythm in relation to the narrated story’s). Environment depiction storytelling tools deals with Joan Didion’s The White Album and the Judicial Opinion in a Rape Case, quoting also from W. G. Sebald’s The Emigrants and the Petition Briefs in Reck v. Ragen and Miranda v. Arizona. Further examples are Kathryn Harrison’s While They Slept and the Petitioner’s Brief in Eddings v. Oklahoma. Finally, the chapter on Narrative Time draws on Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse Five and explores time, rhythm or speed, discussing more deeply stretch and the relation of time of the narrative itself with the time of the facts dealt with in the narrative. Chronology is discussed and criticized; Analepsis or Flashback is didactically explained and exemplified, both in general storytelling theory and in its legal use; the same holds for Prolepsis (Flash-forward) and Ellipsis (the intentional omission of a part of the narrative, often with the purpose of emphasizing the omitted event. Pacing and Rhythm are discussed in more lenght, with the caveat - repeated somewhat throughout the book - that legal stories are often left unfinished by the lawyer, in order to allow the jurors or judges fill the end with their decision. The Author remarks his purpose was to suggest possible tools and ways of dealing with problems which arise in legal storytelling, and he delivers what he promises.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 27, 2017

recommand products